Monitors / Comparison

Samsung LC32F391FWNXZA vs Samsung SH650

Monitor · Samsung

Samsung LC32F391FWNXZA

32″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 42.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung SH650

27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · PLS
GEAR SCORE 41.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel65
Response time50
Verdict

Samsung LC32F391FWNXZA and Samsung SH650 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 41.

  • Response time: Samsung LC32F391FWNXZA leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this

Samsung LC32F391FWNXZA

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Samsung LC32F391FWNXZASamsung SH650
42Gear score41
32″Screen size27″
1920×1080Resolution1920×1080
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
VAPanelPLS
4 msResponse time5 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Samsung LC32F391FWNXZA or Samsung SH650 better?

Samsung LC32F391FWNXZA and Samsung SH650 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 41. Response time: Samsung LC32F391FWNXZA leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).

Similar comparisons

Samsung LC32F391FWNXZA vs ASUS ML239HSamsung LC32F391FWNXZA vs ASUS MX239HSamsung LC32F391FWNXZA vs ASUS MX279HSamsung LC32F391FWNXZA vs BenQ BL2410PTSamsung LC32F391FWNXZA vs BenQ BL2483Samsung SH650 vs ASUS MT276HESamsung SH650 vs ASUS PB238QSamsung SH650 vs ASUS VA249HESamsung SH650 vs Sony FWD48W650DSamsung SH650 vs Samsung SF351