Samsung LF27T700QQNXZA vs Samsung UD970
Samsung LF27T700QQNXZA
27″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSSamsung UD970
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VASamsung LF27T700QQNXZA and Samsung UD970 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 54.
- Resolution: Samsung UD970 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Samsung LF27T700QQNXZA leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Samsung LF27T700QQNXZA
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung UD970
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung LF27T700QQNXZA | Samsung UD970 | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 54 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung LF27T700QQNXZA or Samsung UD970 better?
Samsung LF27T700QQNXZA and Samsung UD970 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 54. Resolution: Samsung UD970 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Samsung LF27T700QQNXZA leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung LF27T700QQNXZA leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).