Monitors / Comparison
Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs Samsung M5
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA
32″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VAEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time30
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung M5
27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VAEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time30
Verdict
Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA and Samsung M5 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA | Samsung M5 | |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | Gear score | 39 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 8 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| ≈ $210 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA or Samsung M5 better?
Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA and Samsung M5 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39.
Similar comparisons
Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs ASUS ML228HSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs ASUS ML238HSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs ASUS ML248HSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs BenQ BL2400PUSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs BenQ BL2485TCSamsung M5 vs ASUS ML228HSamsung M5 vs ASUS ML238HSamsung M5 vs ASUS ML248HSamsung M5 vs BenQ BL2400PUSamsung M5 vs BenQ BL2485TC