Monitors / Comparison
Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs Samsung S24A350H
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA
32″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VAEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time30
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung S24A350H
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TN · 2011Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time78
Recency20
Verdict
Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA and Samsung S24A350H are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39.
- Response time: Samsung S24A350H leads (2 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this
Samsung S24A350H
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA | Samsung S24A350H | |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | Gear score | 39 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | TN |
| 8 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| — | Release year | 2011 |
| ≈ $210 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA or Samsung S24A350H better?
Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA and Samsung S24A350H are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39. Response time: Samsung S24A350H leads (2 ms vs 8 ms).
Similar comparisons
Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs ASUS ML228HSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs ASUS ML238HSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs ASUS ML248HSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs BenQ BL2400PUSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs BenQ BL2485TCSamsung S24A350H vs ASUS ML228HSamsung S24A350H vs ASUS ML238HSamsung S24A350H vs ASUS ML248HSamsung S24A350H vs BenQ BL2400PUSamsung S24A350H vs BenQ BL2485TC