Monitors / Comparison

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs Samsung S31A

Monitor · Samsung

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA

32″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 39.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time30
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung S31A

24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 39.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time30
Verdict

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA and Samsung S31A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39.

  • Response time: Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA leads (8 ms vs 9 ms).
Pick this

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZASamsung S31A
39Gear score39
32″Screen size24″
1920×1080Resolution1920×1080
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
VAPanelVA
8 msResponse time9 ms
≈ $210Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA or Samsung S31A better?

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA and Samsung S31A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39. Response time: Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA leads (8 ms vs 9 ms).