Monitors / Comparison

Samsung LU32J590UQNXZA vs Samsung UD970

Monitor · Samsung

Samsung LU32J590UQNXZA

32″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 55.0 / 100Good
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung UD970

31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 54.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel66
Verdict

Samsung LU32J590UQNXZA and Samsung UD970 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 54.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Samsung LU32J590UQNXZASamsung UD970
55Gear score54
32″Screen size31.5″
3840×2160Resolution3840×2160
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
VAPanelVA
4 msResponse time—
≈ $200Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Samsung LU32J590UQNXZA or Samsung UD970 better?

Samsung LU32J590UQNXZA and Samsung UD970 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 54.

Similar comparisons

Samsung LU32J590UQNXZA vs ASUS MG28UQSamsung LU32J590UQNXZA vs ASUS PB278QVSamsung LU32J590UQNXZA vs ASUS PB287QSamsung LU32J590UQNXZA vs Samsung ViewFinity S70ASamsung UD970 vs ASUS CG32UQSamsung UD970 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNVSamsung UD970 vs BenQ GW2490Samsung UD970 vs BenQ PD3420QSamsung UD970 vs BenQ SW271C