Monitors / Comparison
Samsung S22A200B vs Samsung S24E310HL
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung S22A200B
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TNEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung S24E310HL
23.6″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TNEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time30
Verdict
Samsung S22A200B and Samsung S24E310HL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 38 and 36.
- Response time: Samsung S22A200B leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this
Samsung S22A200B
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung S22A200B | Samsung S24E310HL | |
|---|---|---|
| 38 | Gear score | 36 |
| 21.5″ | Screen size | 23.6″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung S22A200B or Samsung S24E310HL better?
Samsung S22A200B and Samsung S24E310HL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 38 and 36. Response time: Samsung S22A200B leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Similar comparisons
Samsung S22A200B vs ASUS ML249HSamsung S22A200B vs BenQ BENQGW2255Samsung S22A200B vs MSI PRO MP221Samsung S22A200B vs Samsung SE450Samsung S22A200B vs Samsung SE348Samsung S24E310HL vs MSI PRO MP221Samsung S24E310HL vs ASUS VW22AT-CSMSamsung S24E310HL vs BenQ BL2201PUSamsung S24E310HL vs Samsung BX2035Samsung S24E310HL vs Samsung T190GN