Samsung S27B970D vs Samsung S39C
Samsung S27B970D
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPS · 2012Samsung S39C
27″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · VASamsung S27B970D and Samsung S39C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 48 and 46.
- Resolution: Samsung S27B970D leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Samsung S39C leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung S39C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Samsung S27B970D
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung S39C
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung S27B970D | Samsung S39C | |
|---|---|---|
| 48 | Gear score | 46 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| 2012 | Release year | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $140 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung S27B970D or Samsung S39C better?
Samsung S27B970D and Samsung S39C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 48 and 46. Resolution: Samsung S27B970D leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Samsung S39C leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Samsung S39C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung S39C leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).