Monitors / Comparison

Samsung S32E590C vs ViewSonic VP2458

Monitor · Samsung

Samsung S32E590C

31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 42.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · ViewSonic

ViewSonic VP2458

23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 43.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time37
Verdict

Samsung S32E590C and ViewSonic VP2458 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 43.

  • Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 7 ms).
Pick this

Samsung S32E590C

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Samsung S32E590CViewSonic VP2458
42Gear score43
31.5″Screen size23.8″
1920×1080Resolution1920×1080
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
VAPanelIPS
4 msResponse time7 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Samsung S32E590C or ViewSonic VP2458 better?

Samsung S32E590C and ViewSonic VP2458 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 43. Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 7 ms).

Similar comparisons

Samsung S32E590C vs ASUS ML239HSamsung S32E590C vs ASUS MX239HSamsung S32E590C vs ASUS MX279HSamsung S32E590C vs BenQ BL2410PTSamsung S32E590C vs BenQ BL2483ViewSonic VP2458 vs AOC 24B1XHViewSonic VP2458 vs AOC 24B1XHSViewSonic VP2458 vs AOC P2370SDViewSonic VP2458 vs Dell S2240LViewSonic VP2458 vs Dell S2240M