Monitors / Comparison
Samsung S32E590C vs ViewSonic VP2468
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung S32E590C
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VAAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · ViewSonic
ViewSonic VP2468
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time37
Verdict
Samsung S32E590C and ViewSonic VP2468 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 43.
- Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 7 ms).
Pick this
Samsung S32E590C
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung S32E590C | ViewSonic VP2468 | |
|---|---|---|
| 42 | Gear score | 43 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 7 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $356 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung S32E590C or ViewSonic VP2468 better?
Samsung S32E590C and ViewSonic VP2468 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 43. Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 7 ms).
Similar comparisons
Samsung S32E590C vs ASUS ML239HSamsung S32E590C vs ASUS MX239HSamsung S32E590C vs ASUS MX279HSamsung S32E590C vs BenQ BL2410PTSamsung S32E590C vs BenQ BL2483ViewSonic VP2468 vs AOC 24B1XHViewSonic VP2468 vs AOC 24B1XHSViewSonic VP2468 vs AOC P2370SDViewSonic VP2468 vs Dell S2240LViewSonic VP2468 vs Dell S2240M