Samsung S32E590C vs X= XG24CURV
Samsung S32E590C
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VAX= XG24CURV
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · VASamsung S32E590C and X= XG24CURV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 43.
- Refresh rate: X= XG24CURV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Samsung S32E590C
If you care most about response time.
X= XG24CURV
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung S32E590C | X= XG24CURV | |
|---|---|---|
| 42 | Gear score | 43 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung S32E590C or X= XG24CURV better?
Samsung S32E590C and X= XG24CURV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 43. Refresh rate: X= XG24CURV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: X= XG24CURV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).