Monitors / Comparison
Samsung SE310 vs ViewSonic VG2753
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung SE310
23.6″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TNAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time90
VS
Monitor · ViewSonic
ViewSonic VG2753
27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time37
Verdict
Samsung SE310 and ViewSonic VG2753 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 43.
- Response time: Samsung SE310 leads (1 ms vs 7 ms).
Pick this
Samsung SE310
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung SE310 | ViewSonic VG2753 | |
|---|---|---|
| 42 | Gear score | 43 |
| 23.6″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 7 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung SE310 or ViewSonic VG2753 better?
Samsung SE310 and ViewSonic VG2753 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 43. Response time: Samsung SE310 leads (1 ms vs 7 ms).