Monitors / Comparison
Samsung SF351 vs Samsung T22C350ND
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung SF351
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA · 2016Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time50
Recency30
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung T22C350ND
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TNAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time78
Verdict
Samsung SF351 and Samsung T22C350ND are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 40 and 41.
- Response time: Samsung T22C350ND leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
Samsung T22C350ND
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung SF351 | Samsung T22C350ND | |
|---|---|---|
| 40 | Gear score | 41 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 21.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| 2016 | Release year | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung SF351 or Samsung T22C350ND better?
Samsung SF351 and Samsung T22C350ND are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 40 and 41. Response time: Samsung T22C350ND leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).