ATK A9 Pro Max vs Lamzu Thorn 4K
ATK A9 Pro Max
57 g · PAW3395 Ultra · Wireless · 2024Lamzu Thorn 4K
52 g · PAW3395 · WirelessATK A9 Pro Max and Lamzu Thorn 4K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90.
- Lamzu Thorn 4K is 5 g lighter (52 g vs 57 g).
- Polling rate: ATK A9 Pro Max leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
ATK A9 Pro Max
If you care most about polling rate.
Lamzu Thorn 4K
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ATK A9 Pro Max | Lamzu Thorn 4K | |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | Gear score | 90 |
| 57 g | Weight | 52 g |
| PAW3395 Ultra | Sensor | PAW3395 |
| 26,000 | Max DPI | 26,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 4000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
| 2024 | Release year | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $92 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ATK A9 Pro Max or Lamzu Thorn 4K better?
ATK A9 Pro Max and Lamzu Thorn 4K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90. Lamzu Thorn 4K is 5 g lighter (52 g vs 57 g). Polling rate: ATK A9 Pro Max leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Which one is lighter?
Lamzu Thorn 4K is 5 g lighter (52 g vs 57 g).