ATK Duckbill vs Pulsar X2F
ATK Duckbill
46 g · PAW3950 Ultra · WirelessPulsar X2F
38 g · Pulsar XS-1 · WirelessATK Duckbill and Pulsar X2F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- Pulsar X2F is 8 g lighter (38 g vs 46 g).
- Max DPI: ATK Duckbill leads (42,000 vs 32,000).
ATK Duckbill
If you care most about max DPI.
Pulsar X2F
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ATK Duckbill | Pulsar X2F | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| 46 g | Weight | 38 g |
| PAW3950 Ultra | Sensor | Pulsar XS-1 |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 32,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ATK Duckbill or Pulsar X2F better?
ATK Duckbill and Pulsar X2F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. Pulsar X2F is 8 g lighter (38 g vs 46 g). Max DPI: ATK Duckbill leads (42,000 vs 32,000).
Which one is lighter?
Pulsar X2F is 8 g lighter (38 g vs 46 g).