Mice / Comparison
Attack Shark R5 Turbo vs Pwnage Trinity Fiber
Mouse · Attack Shark
Attack Shark R5 Turbo
43 g · PAW3950 · WirelessTop tier
Lightness90
Sensor100
Polling rate100
Connection100
VS
Mouse · Pwnage
Pwnage Trinity Fiber
37 g · PAW3950 · WirelessTop tier
Lightness94
Sensor92
Polling rate100
Connection100
Verdict
Attack Shark R5 Turbo and Pwnage Trinity Fiber are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 96 and 96.
- Pwnage Trinity Fiber is 6 g lighter (37 g vs 43 g).
Pick this
Pwnage Trinity Fiber
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Attack Shark R5 Turbo | Pwnage Trinity Fiber | |
|---|---|---|
| 96 | Gear score | 96 |
| 43 g | Weight | 37 g |
| PAW3950 | Sensor | PAW3950 |
| 60,000 | Max DPI | — |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Attack Shark R5 Turbo or Pwnage Trinity Fiber better?
Attack Shark R5 Turbo and Pwnage Trinity Fiber are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 96 and 96. Pwnage Trinity Fiber is 6 g lighter (37 g vs 43 g).
Which one is lighter?
Pwnage Trinity Fiber is 6 g lighter (37 g vs 43 g).
Similar comparisons
Attack Shark R5 Turbo vs Razer Viper V4 ProAttack Shark R5 Turbo vs Attack Shark R2Attack Shark R5 Turbo vs ASUS ROG Harpe Ace MiniAttack Shark R5 Turbo vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 MiniAttack Shark R5 Turbo vs Pulsar X2 CrazyLight MiniPwnage Trinity Fiber vs Razer Viper V4 ProPwnage Trinity Fiber vs ASUS ROG Harpe Ace MiniPwnage Trinity Fiber vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 MiniPwnage Trinity Fiber vs Pulsar X2 CrazyLight MiniPwnage Trinity Fiber vs Pulsar X2 CrazyLight