Attack Shark R5 Ultra vs G-Wolves HT-S2 Pro
Attack Shark R5 Ultra
39 g · PAW3950 · WirelessG-Wolves HT-S2 Pro
28 g · 30,000 DPI · WirelessAttack Shark R5 Ultra and G-Wolves HT-S2 Pro are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 97 and 97.
- G-Wolves HT-S2 Pro is 11 g lighter (28 g vs 39 g).
- Max DPI: Attack Shark R5 Ultra leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Attack Shark R5 Ultra
If you care most about max DPI.
G-Wolves HT-S2 Pro
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Attack Shark R5 Ultra | G-Wolves HT-S2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| 97 | Gear score | 97 |
| 39 g | Weight | 28 g |
| PAW3950 | Sensor | — |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 30,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Attack Shark R5 Ultra or G-Wolves HT-S2 Pro better?
Attack Shark R5 Ultra and G-Wolves HT-S2 Pro are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 97 and 97. G-Wolves HT-S2 Pro is 11 g lighter (28 g vs 39 g). Max DPI: Attack Shark R5 Ultra leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Which one is lighter?
G-Wolves HT-S2 Pro is 11 g lighter (28 g vs 39 g).