Attack Shark RS3 Ultra vs Pulsar eS FS1
Attack Shark RS3 Ultra
63 g · PAW3955 Max · WirelessPulsar eS FS1
56 g · Pulsar XS-1 · WirelessAttack Shark RS3 Ultra and Pulsar eS FS1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 91 and 91.
- Pulsar eS FS1 is 7 g lighter (56 g vs 63 g).
- Max DPI: Attack Shark RS3 Ultra leads (52,000 vs 32,000).
Attack Shark RS3 Ultra
If you care most about max DPI.
Pulsar eS FS1
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Attack Shark RS3 Ultra | Pulsar eS FS1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 91 | Gear score | 91 |
| 63 g | Weight | 56 g |
| PAW3955 Max | Sensor | Pulsar XS-1 |
| 52,000 | Max DPI | 32,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
| — | Battery life | 160 h |
| ≈ $110 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Attack Shark RS3 Ultra or Pulsar eS FS1 better?
Attack Shark RS3 Ultra and Pulsar eS FS1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 91 and 91. Pulsar eS FS1 is 7 g lighter (56 g vs 63 g). Max DPI: Attack Shark RS3 Ultra leads (52,000 vs 32,000).
Which one is lighter?
Pulsar eS FS1 is 7 g lighter (56 g vs 63 g).