Attack Shark X3 Pro vs Lamzu Thorn 4K
Attack Shark X3 Pro
59 g · PAW3395 · WirelessLamzu Thorn 4K
52 g · PAW3395 · WirelessAttack Shark X3 Pro and Lamzu Thorn 4K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90.
- Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g).
- Polling rate: Attack Shark X3 Pro leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Attack Shark X3 Pro
If you care most about polling rate.
Lamzu Thorn 4K
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Attack Shark X3 Pro | Lamzu Thorn 4K | |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | Gear score | 90 |
| 59 g | Weight | 52 g |
| PAW3395 | Sensor | PAW3395 |
| 26,000 | Max DPI | 26,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 4000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $92 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Attack Shark X3 Pro or Lamzu Thorn 4K better?
Attack Shark X3 Pro and Lamzu Thorn 4K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90. Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g). Polling rate: Attack Shark X3 Pro leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Which one is lighter?
Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g).