Mice / Comparison

Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESS vs ZOWIE S2-C

Mouse · Corsair

Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESS

110 g · Marksman 26K · Wireless · 2022
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Lightness32
Sensor92
Polling rate80
Connection100
Battery life87
Recency69
VS
Mouse · ZOWIE

ZOWIE S2-C

69 g · PixArt PMW3360 · Wired
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Lightness68
Sensor76
Polling rate66
Connection65
Verdict

Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESS and ZOWIE S2-C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.

  • ZOWIE S2-C is 41 g lighter (69 g vs 110 g).
  • Max DPI: Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESS leads (26,000 vs 3,200).
  • Polling rate: Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESS leads (2000 Hz vs 1000 Hz).
  • Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESS is wireless; ZOWIE S2-C is wired.
Pick this

Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESS

If you care most about max DPI, polling rate, connection.

Pick this

ZOWIE S2-C

If you care most about weight.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESSZOWIE S2-C
70Gear score70
110 gWeight69 g
Marksman 26KSensorPixArt PMW3360
26,000Max DPI3,200
2000 HzPolling rate1000 Hz
WirelessConnectionWired
90 hBattery life—
2022Release year—
≈ $130Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESS or ZOWIE S2-C better?

Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESS and ZOWIE S2-C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. ZOWIE S2-C is 41 g lighter (69 g vs 110 g). Max DPI: Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESS leads (26,000 vs 3,200). Polling rate: Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA WIRELESS leads (2000 Hz vs 1000 Hz).

Which one is lighter?

ZOWIE S2-C is 41 g lighter (69 g vs 110 g).