Darmoshark M3 Micro V2 vs Pulsar eS Xlite
Darmoshark M3 Micro V2
42 g · PAW3950 · WirelessPulsar eS Xlite
51 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessDarmoshark M3 Micro V2 and Pulsar eS Xlite are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 94 and 94.
- Darmoshark M3 Micro V2 is 9 g lighter (42 g vs 51 g).
- Max DPI: Pulsar eS Xlite leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Darmoshark M3 Micro V2
If you care most about weight.
Pulsar eS Xlite
If you care most about max DPI.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Darmoshark M3 Micro V2 | Pulsar eS Xlite | |
|---|---|---|
| 94 | Gear score | 94 |
| 42 g | Weight | 51 g |
| PAW3950 | Sensor | Pulsar XS-2 |
| 30,000 | Max DPI | 42,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Darmoshark M3 Micro V2 or Pulsar eS Xlite better?
Darmoshark M3 Micro V2 and Pulsar eS Xlite are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 94 and 94. Darmoshark M3 Micro V2 is 9 g lighter (42 g vs 51 g). Max DPI: Pulsar eS Xlite leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Which one is lighter?
Darmoshark M3 Micro V2 is 9 g lighter (42 g vs 51 g).