Darmoshark M3 V2 vs Lamzu Thorn 4K
Darmoshark M3 V2
58 g · PAW3395 · WirelessLamzu Thorn 4K
52 g · PAW3395 · WirelessDarmoshark M3 V2 and Lamzu Thorn 4K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90.
- Lamzu Thorn 4K is 6 g lighter (52 g vs 58 g).
- Polling rate: Darmoshark M3 V2 leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Darmoshark M3 V2
If you care most about polling rate.
Lamzu Thorn 4K
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Darmoshark M3 V2 | Lamzu Thorn 4K | |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | Gear score | 90 |
| 58 g | Weight | 52 g |
| PAW3395 | Sensor | PAW3395 |
| 26,000 | Max DPI | 26,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 4000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $92 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Darmoshark M3 V2 or Lamzu Thorn 4K better?
Darmoshark M3 V2 and Lamzu Thorn 4K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90. Lamzu Thorn 4K is 6 g lighter (52 g vs 58 g). Polling rate: Darmoshark M3 V2 leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Which one is lighter?
Lamzu Thorn 4K is 6 g lighter (52 g vs 58 g).