Darmoshark M3 XS vs Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X
Darmoshark M3 XS
45 g · PAW3395 · WirelessPulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X
53 g · Pulsar XS-1 · WirelessDarmoshark M3 XS and Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 92 and 92.
- Darmoshark M3 XS is 8 g lighter (45 g vs 53 g).
- Max DPI: Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X leads (32,000 vs 26,000).
- Polling rate: Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Darmoshark M3 XS
If you care most about weight.
Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X
If you care most about max DPI, polling rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Darmoshark M3 XS | Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X | |
|---|---|---|
| 92 | Gear score | 92 |
| 45 g | Weight | 53 g |
| PAW3395 | Sensor | Pulsar XS-1 |
| 26,000 | Max DPI | 32,000 |
| 4000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Darmoshark M3 XS or Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X better?
Darmoshark M3 XS and Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 92 and 92. Darmoshark M3 XS is 8 g lighter (45 g vs 53 g). Max DPI: Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X leads (32,000 vs 26,000). Polling rate: Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Which one is lighter?
Darmoshark M3 XS is 8 g lighter (45 g vs 53 g).