Darmoshark M9 vs Pulsar Pro Series STA-X
Darmoshark M9
59 g · PAW3950 · WirelessPulsar Pro Series STA-X
60 g · Pulsar XS-1 · WirelessDarmoshark M9 and Pulsar Pro Series STA-X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90.
- Darmoshark M9 is 1 g lighter (59 g vs 60 g).
- Max DPI: Pulsar Pro Series STA-X leads (32,000 vs 30,000).
Darmoshark M9
If you care most about weight.
Pulsar Pro Series STA-X
If you care most about max DPI.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Darmoshark M9 | Pulsar Pro Series STA-X | |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | Gear score | 90 |
| 59 g | Weight | 60 g |
| PAW3950 | Sensor | Pulsar XS-1 |
| 30,000 | Max DPI | 32,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Darmoshark M9 or Pulsar Pro Series STA-X better?
Darmoshark M9 and Pulsar Pro Series STA-X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90. Darmoshark M9 is 1 g lighter (59 g vs 60 g). Max DPI: Pulsar Pro Series STA-X leads (32,000 vs 30,000).
Which one is lighter?
Darmoshark M9 is 1 g lighter (59 g vs 60 g).