Gigabyte XM300 vs SteelSeries 62250
SteelSeries 62250
102 g · 5,670 DPI · Wireless · 2014Gigabyte XM300 and SteelSeries 62250 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 46.
- Gigabyte XM300 is 1 g lighter (101 g vs 102 g).
- Max DPI: Gigabyte XM300 leads (6,400 vs 5,670).
- SteelSeries 62250 is wireless; Gigabyte XM300 is wired.
Gigabyte XM300
If you care most about weight, max DPI.
SteelSeries 62250
If you care most about connection.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte XM300 | SteelSeries 62250 | |
|---|---|---|
| 46 | Gear score | 46 |
| 101 g | Weight | 102 g |
| PMW3988 | Sensor | — |
| 6,400 | Max DPI | 5,670 |
| Wired | Connection | Wireless |
| — | Release year | 2014 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte XM300 or SteelSeries 62250 better?
Gigabyte XM300 and SteelSeries 62250 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 46. Gigabyte XM300 is 1 g lighter (101 g vs 102 g). Max DPI: Gigabyte XM300 leads (6,400 vs 5,670). SteelSeries 62250 is wireless; Gigabyte XM300 is wired.
Which one is lighter?
Gigabyte XM300 is 1 g lighter (101 g vs 102 g).