Lamzu Inca vs WLmouse Beast X 8K
Lamzu Inca
40 g · PAW3950 · WirelessWLmouse Beast X 8K
39 g · PAW3395 · WirelessLamzu Inca and WLmouse Beast X 8K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- WLmouse Beast X 8K is 1 g lighter (39 g vs 40 g).
- Max DPI: Lamzu Inca leads (30,000 vs 26,000).
Lamzu Inca
If you care most about max DPI.
WLmouse Beast X 8K
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Lamzu Inca | WLmouse Beast X 8K | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| 40 g | Weight | 39 g |
| PAW3950 | Sensor | PAW3395 |
| 30,000 | Max DPI | 26,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Lamzu Inca or WLmouse Beast X 8K better?
Lamzu Inca and WLmouse Beast X 8K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. WLmouse Beast X 8K is 1 g lighter (39 g vs 40 g). Max DPI: Lamzu Inca leads (30,000 vs 26,000).
Which one is lighter?
WLmouse Beast X 8K is 1 g lighter (39 g vs 40 g).