Lamzu Maya X V2 vs Pulsar X2N CrazyLight Mini
Lamzu Maya X V2
47 g · PAW NEXT I · WirelessPulsar X2N CrazyLight Mini
40 g · Pulsar XS-1 · WirelessLamzu Maya X V2 and Pulsar X2N CrazyLight Mini are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- Pulsar X2N CrazyLight Mini is 7 g lighter (40 g vs 47 g).
- Max DPI: Lamzu Maya X V2 leads (50,000 vs 32,000).
Lamzu Maya X V2
If you care most about max DPI.
Pulsar X2N CrazyLight Mini
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Lamzu Maya X V2 | Pulsar X2N CrazyLight Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| 47 g | Weight | 40 g |
| PAW NEXT I | Sensor | Pulsar XS-1 |
| 50,000 | Max DPI | 32,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Lamzu Maya X V2 or Pulsar X2N CrazyLight Mini better?
Lamzu Maya X V2 and Pulsar X2N CrazyLight Mini are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. Pulsar X2N CrazyLight Mini is 7 g lighter (40 g vs 47 g). Max DPI: Lamzu Maya X V2 leads (50,000 vs 32,000).
Which one is lighter?
Pulsar X2N CrazyLight Mini is 7 g lighter (40 g vs 47 g).