Lamzu Orcus vs Pulsar X2F CrazyLight
Lamzu Orcus
38 g · PAW NEXT I · WirelessPulsar X2F CrazyLight
29 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessLamzu Orcus and Pulsar X2F CrazyLight are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 98 and 99.
- Pulsar X2F CrazyLight is 9 g lighter (29 g vs 38 g).
- Max DPI: Lamzu Orcus leads (50,000 vs 42,000).
Lamzu Orcus
If you care most about max DPI.
Pulsar X2F CrazyLight
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Lamzu Orcus | Pulsar X2F CrazyLight | |
|---|---|---|
| 98 | Gear score | 99 |
| 38 g | Weight | 29 g |
| PAW NEXT I | Sensor | Pulsar XS-2 |
| 50,000 | Max DPI | 42,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Lamzu Orcus or Pulsar X2F CrazyLight better?
Lamzu Orcus and Pulsar X2F CrazyLight are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 98 and 99. Pulsar X2F CrazyLight is 9 g lighter (29 g vs 38 g). Max DPI: Lamzu Orcus leads (50,000 vs 42,000).
Which one is lighter?
Pulsar X2F CrazyLight is 9 g lighter (29 g vs 38 g).