Lamzu Thorn 4K vs MCHOSE A5 Ultra
Lamzu Thorn 4K
52 g · PAW3395 · WirelessMCHOSE A5 Ultra
59 g · PAW3395 · WirelessLamzu Thorn 4K and MCHOSE A5 Ultra are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90.
- Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g).
- Polling rate: MCHOSE A5 Ultra leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Lamzu Thorn 4K
If you care most about weight.
MCHOSE A5 Ultra
If you care most about polling rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Lamzu Thorn 4K | MCHOSE A5 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | Gear score | 90 |
| 52 g | Weight | 59 g |
| PAW3395 | Sensor | PAW3395 |
| 26,000 | Max DPI | 26,000 |
| 4000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
| ≈ $92 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Lamzu Thorn 4K or MCHOSE A5 Ultra better?
Lamzu Thorn 4K and MCHOSE A5 Ultra are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90. Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g). Polling rate: MCHOSE A5 Ultra leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Which one is lighter?
Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g).