Lamzu Thorn 4K vs MCHOSE A7 Pro
Lamzu Thorn 4K
52 g · PAW3395 · WirelessMCHOSE A7 Pro
59 g · PAW3395 · WirelessLamzu Thorn 4K and MCHOSE A7 Pro are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90.
- Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g).
- Polling rate: MCHOSE A7 Pro leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Lamzu Thorn 4K
If you care most about weight.
MCHOSE A7 Pro
If you care most about polling rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Lamzu Thorn 4K | MCHOSE A7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | Gear score | 90 |
| 52 g | Weight | 59 g |
| PAW3395 | Sensor | PAW3395 |
| 26,000 | Max DPI | 26,000 |
| 4000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
| ≈ $92 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Lamzu Thorn 4K or MCHOSE A7 Pro better?
Lamzu Thorn 4K and MCHOSE A7 Pro are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90. Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g). Polling rate: MCHOSE A7 Pro leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Which one is lighter?
Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g).