Lamzu Thorn 4K vs Pulsar X2 v3 eS Mini
Lamzu Thorn 4K
52 g · PAW3395 · WirelessPulsar X2 v3 eS Mini
59 g · Pulsar XS-1 · WirelessLamzu Thorn 4K and Pulsar X2 v3 eS Mini are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90.
- Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g).
- Max DPI: Pulsar X2 v3 eS Mini leads (32,000 vs 26,000).
- Polling rate: Pulsar X2 v3 eS Mini leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Lamzu Thorn 4K
If you care most about weight.
Pulsar X2 v3 eS Mini
If you care most about max DPI, polling rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Lamzu Thorn 4K | Pulsar X2 v3 eS Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | Gear score | 90 |
| 52 g | Weight | 59 g |
| PAW3395 | Sensor | Pulsar XS-1 |
| 26,000 | Max DPI | 32,000 |
| 4000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
| ≈ $92 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Lamzu Thorn 4K or Pulsar X2 v3 eS Mini better?
Lamzu Thorn 4K and Pulsar X2 v3 eS Mini are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 90. Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g). Max DPI: Pulsar X2 v3 eS Mini leads (32,000 vs 26,000). Polling rate: Pulsar X2 v3 eS Mini leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Which one is lighter?
Lamzu Thorn 4K is 7 g lighter (52 g vs 59 g).