Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium vs Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
47 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessPulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini
39 g · Pulsar XS-1 · WirelessPulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium and Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini is 8 g lighter (39 g vs 47 g).
- Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium leads (42,000 vs 32,000).
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
If you care most about max DPI.
Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium | Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| 47 g | Weight | 39 g |
| Pulsar XS-2 | Sensor | Pulsar XS-1 |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 32,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium or Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini better?
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium and Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini is 8 g lighter (39 g vs 47 g). Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium leads (42,000 vs 32,000).
Which one is lighter?
Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini is 8 g lighter (39 g vs 47 g).