Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini vs WLmouse Beast G Mini
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini
43 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessWLmouse Beast G Mini
35 g · PAW3950 HS · WirelessPulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini and WLmouse Beast G Mini are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 96 and 96.
- WLmouse Beast G Mini is 8 g lighter (35 g vs 43 g).
- Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini
If you care most about max DPI.
WLmouse Beast G Mini
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini | WLmouse Beast G Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| 96 | Gear score | 96 |
| 43 g | Weight | 35 g |
| Pulsar XS-2 | Sensor | PAW3950 HS |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 30,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini or WLmouse Beast G Mini better?
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini and WLmouse Beast G Mini are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 96 and 96. WLmouse Beast G Mini is 8 g lighter (35 g vs 43 g). Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Which one is lighter?
WLmouse Beast G Mini is 8 g lighter (35 g vs 43 g).