Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini vs WLmouse Beast X V2 Med
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini
43 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessWLmouse Beast X V2 Med
45 g · PAW3955HS · WirelessPulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini and WLmouse Beast X V2 Med are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 96 and 96.
- Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini is 2 g lighter (43 g vs 45 g).
- Max DPI: WLmouse Beast X V2 Med leads (50,000 vs 42,000).
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini
If you care most about weight.
WLmouse Beast X V2 Med
If you care most about max DPI.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini | WLmouse Beast X V2 Med | |
|---|---|---|
| 96 | Gear score | 96 |
| 43 g | Weight | 45 g |
| Pulsar XS-2 | Sensor | PAW3955HS |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 50,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini or WLmouse Beast X V2 Med better?
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini and WLmouse Beast X V2 Med are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 96 and 96. Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini is 2 g lighter (43 g vs 45 g). Max DPI: WLmouse Beast X V2 Med leads (50,000 vs 42,000).
Which one is lighter?
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini is 2 g lighter (43 g vs 45 g).