Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini vs WLmouse Ying
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini
43 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessWLmouse Ying
37 g · PAW3950 HS · WirelessPulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini and WLmouse Ying are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 96 and 96.
- WLmouse Ying is 6 g lighter (37 g vs 43 g).
- Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini
If you care most about max DPI.
WLmouse Ying
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini | WLmouse Ying | |
|---|---|---|
| 96 | Gear score | 96 |
| 43 g | Weight | 37 g |
| Pulsar XS-2 | Sensor | PAW3950 HS |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 30,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini or WLmouse Ying better?
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini and WLmouse Ying are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 96 and 96. WLmouse Ying is 6 g lighter (37 g vs 43 g). Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Which one is lighter?
WLmouse Ying is 6 g lighter (37 g vs 43 g).