Pulsar X2A eS vs SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
Pulsar X2A eS
69 g · PAW3395 · WirelessSteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
68 g · SteelSeries TrueMove 26K · Wireless · 2026Pulsar X2A eS and SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 85.
- SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 is 1 g lighter (68 g vs 69 g).
- Polling rate: Pulsar X2A eS leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Pulsar X2A eS
If you care most about polling rate.
SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Pulsar X2A eS | SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 86 | Gear score | 85 |
| 69 g | Weight | 68 g |
| PAW3395 | Sensor | SteelSeries TrueMove 26K |
| 26,000 | Max DPI | 26,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 4000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
| — | Release year | 2026 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Pulsar X2A eS or SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 better?
Pulsar X2A eS and SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 85. SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 is 1 g lighter (68 g vs 69 g). Polling rate: Pulsar X2A eS leads (8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz).
Which one is lighter?
SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 is 1 g lighter (68 g vs 69 g).