Acer Predator Apollo RGB 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL17 vs G.Skill Trident Z Neo 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL14
Acer Predator Apollo RGB 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL17
2×8 GB · DDR4 · 4000 MHz · CL17G.Skill Trident Z Neo 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL14
2×8 GB · DDR4 · 4000 MHz · CL14Acer Predator Apollo RGB 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL17 and G.Skill Trident Z Neo 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL14 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77.
- CAS latency: G.Skill Trident Z Neo 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL14 leads (CL14 vs CL17).
- G.Skill Trident Z Neo 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL14 has lower true latency (7.0 ns vs 8.5 ns; speed and CL combined).
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL14
If you care most about cAS latency, true latency.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer Predator Apollo RGB 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL17 | G.Skill Trident Z Neo 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL14 | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 77 |
| DDR4 | Type | DDR4 |
| 16 GB | Total capacity | 16 GB |
| 2×8 GB | Kit | 2×8 GB |
| 4,000 MHz | Speed | 4,000 MHz |
| CL17 | CAS latency | CL14 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer Predator Apollo RGB 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL17 or G.Skill Trident Z Neo 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL14 better?
Acer Predator Apollo RGB 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL17 and G.Skill Trident Z Neo 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL14 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77. CAS latency: G.Skill Trident Z Neo 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL14 leads (CL14 vs CL17). G.Skill Trident Z Neo 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4000 CL14 has lower true latency (7.0 ns vs 8.5 ns; speed and CL combined).