Acer Predator Apollo RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL17 vs Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL16
Acer Predator Apollo RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL17
2×16 GB · DDR4 · 4000 MHz · CL17Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL16
2×16 GB · DDR4 · 4000 MHz · CL16Acer Predator Apollo RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL17 and Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL16 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84.
- CAS latency: Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL16 leads (CL16 vs CL17).
- Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL16 has lower true latency (8.0 ns vs 8.5 ns; speed and CL combined).
Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL16
If you care most about cAS latency, true latency.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer Predator Apollo RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL17 | Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL16 | |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | Gear score | 84 |
| DDR4 | Type | DDR4 |
| 32 GB | Total capacity | 32 GB |
| 2×16 GB | Kit | 2×16 GB |
| 4,000 MHz | Speed | 4,000 MHz |
| CL17 | CAS latency | CL16 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer Predator Apollo RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL17 or Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL16 better?
Acer Predator Apollo RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL17 and Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL16 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84. CAS latency: Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL16 leads (CL16 vs CL17). Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 4000 CL16 has lower true latency (8.0 ns vs 8.5 ns; speed and CL combined).