Memory kits / Comparison

Acer Predator Hera RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40 vs Klevv CRAS V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL38

RAM · Acer

Acer Predator Hera RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40

2×24 GB · DDR5 · 8200 MHz · CL40
GEAR SCORE 97.0 / 100Top tier
Capacity95
Speed100
Latency92
Generation100
VS
RAM · Klevv

Klevv CRAS V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL38

2×24 GB · DDR5 · 8200 MHz · CL38
GEAR SCORE 97.0 / 100Top tier
Capacity95
Speed100
Latency95
Generation100
Verdict

Acer Predator Hera RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40 and Klevv CRAS V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL38 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 97 and 97.

  • CAS latency: Klevv CRAS V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL38 leads (CL38 vs CL40).
  • Klevv CRAS V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL38 has lower true latency (9.3 ns vs 9.8 ns; speed and CL combined).
Pick this

Klevv CRAS V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL38

If you care most about cAS latency, true latency.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Acer Predator Hera RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40Klevv CRAS V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL38
97Gear score97
DDR5TypeDDR5
48 GBTotal capacity48 GB
2×24 GBKit2×24 GB
8,200 MHzSpeed8,200 MHz
CL40CAS latencyCL38

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Acer Predator Hera RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40 or Klevv CRAS V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL38 better?

Acer Predator Hera RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40 and Klevv CRAS V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL38 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 97 and 97. CAS latency: Klevv CRAS V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL38 leads (CL38 vs CL40). Klevv CRAS V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL38 has lower true latency (9.3 ns vs 9.8 ns; speed and CL combined).