Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 vs Corsair XMS 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1333 CL9
Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22
1×8 GB · DDR4 · 3200 MHz · CL22Corsair XMS 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1333 CL9
8×8 GB · DDR3 · 1333 MHz · CL9Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 and Corsair XMS 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1333 CL9 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.
- Total capacity: Corsair XMS 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1333 CL9 leads (64 GB vs 8 GB).
- Speed: Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 leads (3,200 MHz vs 1,333 MHz).
- CAS latency: Corsair XMS 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1333 CL9 leads (CL9 vs CL22).
Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22
If you care most about speed.
Corsair XMS 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1333 CL9
If you care most about total capacity, cAS latency.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 | Corsair XMS 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1333 CL9 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 54 |
| DDR4 | Type | DDR3 |
| 8 GB | Total capacity | 64 GB |
| 1×8 GB | Kit | 8×8 GB |
| 3,200 MHz | Speed | 1,333 MHz |
| CL22 | CAS latency | CL9 |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $680 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 or Corsair XMS 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1333 CL9 better?
Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 and Corsair XMS 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1333 CL9 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Total capacity: Corsair XMS 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1333 CL9 leads (64 GB vs 8 GB). Speed: Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 leads (3,200 MHz vs 1,333 MHz). CAS latency: Corsair XMS 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1333 CL9 leads (CL9 vs CL22).
Which one is faster?
Speed: Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 leads (3,200 MHz vs 1,333 MHz).