Memory kits / Comparison

Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 vs GeIL EVO X II AMD 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL19

RAM · Acer

Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22

1×8 GB · DDR4 · 3200 MHz · CL22
GEAR SCORE 54.0 / 100Average
Capacity35
Speed60
Latency64
Generation62
VS
RAM · GeIL

GeIL EVO X II AMD 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL19

2×8 GB · DDR4 · 2400 MHz · CL19
GEAR SCORE 54.0 / 100Average
Capacity65
Speed40
Latency51
Generation62
Verdict

Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 and GeIL EVO X II AMD 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL19 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.

  • Total capacity: GeIL EVO X II AMD 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL19 leads (16 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Speed: Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 leads (3,200 MHz vs 2,400 MHz).
  • CAS latency: GeIL EVO X II AMD 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL19 leads (CL19 vs CL22).
  • Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 has lower true latency (13.8 ns vs 15.8 ns; speed and CL combined).
Pick this

Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22

If you care most about speed, true latency.

Pick this

GeIL EVO X II AMD 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL19

If you care most about total capacity, cAS latency.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22GeIL EVO X II AMD 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL19
54Gear score54
DDR4TypeDDR4
8 GBTotal capacity16 GB
1×8 GBKit2×8 GB
3,200 MHzSpeed2,400 MHz
CL22CAS latencyCL19

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 or GeIL EVO X II AMD 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL19 better?

Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 and GeIL EVO X II AMD 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL19 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Total capacity: GeIL EVO X II AMD 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL19 leads (16 GB vs 8 GB). Speed: Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 leads (3,200 MHz vs 2,400 MHz). CAS latency: GeIL EVO X II AMD 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL19 leads (CL19 vs CL22).

Which one is faster?

Speed: Acer UD100 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL22 leads (3,200 MHz vs 2,400 MHz).