Memory kits / Comparison

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5 6000 CL30 vs G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000

RAM · ADATA

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5 6000 CL30

2×32 GB · DDR5 · 6000 MHz · CL30
GEAR SCORE 93.0 / 100Top tier
Capacity100
Speed86
Latency90
Generation100
VS
RAM · G.Skill

G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000

2x 32GB · DDR5 · 6000 MHz · CL30
GEAR SCORE 93.0 / 100Top tier
Capacity100
Speed86
Latency90
Generation100
Verdict

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5 6000 CL30 and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 93 and 93.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5 6000 CL30G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000
93Gear score93
DDR5TypeDDR5
64 GBTotal capacity64 GB
2×32 GBKit2x 32GB
6,000 MHzSpeed6,000 MHz
CL30CAS latencyCL30
≈ $680Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5 6000 CL30 or G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 better?

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5 6000 CL30 and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 93 and 93.