Memory kits / Comparison

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 vs G.Skill Ripjaws Z 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1866 CL10

RAM · Corsair

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16

2×16 GB · DDR4 · 2133 MHz
GEAR SCORE 61.0 / 100Good
Capacity90
Speed32
Generation62
VS
RAM · G.Skill

G.Skill Ripjaws Z 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1866 CL10

8×8 GB · DDR3 · 1866 MHz · CL10
GEAR SCORE 62.0 / 100Good
Capacity100
Speed23
Latency84
Generation25
Verdict

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 and G.Skill Ripjaws Z 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1866 CL10 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 62.

  • Total capacity: G.Skill Ripjaws Z 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1866 CL10 leads (64 GB vs 32 GB).
  • Speed: Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 leads (2,133 MHz vs 1,866 MHz).
Pick this

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16

If you care most about speed.

Pick this

G.Skill Ripjaws Z 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1866 CL10

If you care most about total capacity.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16G.Skill Ripjaws Z 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1866 CL10
61Gear score62
DDR4TypeDDR3
32 GBTotal capacity64 GB
2×16 GBKit8×8 GB
2,133 MHzSpeed1,866 MHz
—CAS latencyCL10
2Setups using it0

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Average setup score of people using these: 86.7 What’s yours?

FAQ

Is Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 or G.Skill Ripjaws Z 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1866 CL10 better?

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 and G.Skill Ripjaws Z 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1866 CL10 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 62. Total capacity: G.Skill Ripjaws Z 64GB (8x8GB) DDR3 1866 CL10 leads (64 GB vs 32 GB). Speed: Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 leads (2,133 MHz vs 1,866 MHz).

Which one is faster?

Speed: Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 leads (2,133 MHz vs 1,866 MHz).