Corsair Vengeance CUDIMM 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8000 CL38 vs GeIL EVO V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40
Corsair Vengeance CUDIMM 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8000 CL38
2×24 GB · DDR5 · 8000 MHz · CL38GeIL EVO V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40
2×24 GB · DDR5 · 8200 MHz · CL40Corsair Vengeance CUDIMM 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8000 CL38 and GeIL EVO V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 97 and 97.
- Speed: GeIL EVO V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40 leads (8,200 MHz vs 8,000 MHz).
- CAS latency: Corsair Vengeance CUDIMM 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8000 CL38 leads (CL38 vs CL40).
Corsair Vengeance CUDIMM 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8000 CL38
If you care most about cAS latency.
GeIL EVO V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40
If you care most about speed.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair Vengeance CUDIMM 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8000 CL38 | GeIL EVO V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40 | |
|---|---|---|
| 97 | Gear score | 97 |
| DDR5 | Type | DDR5 |
| 48 GB | Total capacity | 48 GB |
| 2×24 GB | Kit | 2×24 GB |
| 8,000 MHz | Speed | 8,200 MHz |
| CL38 | CAS latency | CL40 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair Vengeance CUDIMM 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8000 CL38 or GeIL EVO V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40 better?
Corsair Vengeance CUDIMM 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8000 CL38 and GeIL EVO V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 97 and 97. Speed: GeIL EVO V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40 leads (8,200 MHz vs 8,000 MHz). CAS latency: Corsair Vengeance CUDIMM 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8000 CL38 leads (CL38 vs CL40).
Which one is faster?
Speed: GeIL EVO V RGB 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 8200 CL40 leads (8,200 MHz vs 8,000 MHz).