Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 vs G.Skill Ripjaws 4 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 2666 CL15
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400
2×8 GB · DDR4 · 2400 MHzG.Skill Ripjaws 4 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 2666 CL15
2×4 GB · DDR4 · 2666 MHz · CL15Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 and G.Skill Ripjaws 4 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 2666 CL15 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.
- Total capacity: Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 leads (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- Speed: G.Skill Ripjaws 4 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 2666 CL15 leads (2,666 MHz vs 2,400 MHz).
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400
If you care most about total capacity.
G.Skill Ripjaws 4 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 2666 CL15
If you care most about speed.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 | G.Skill Ripjaws 4 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 2666 CL15 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 54 |
| DDR4 | Type | DDR4 |
| 16 GB | Total capacity | 8 GB |
| 2×8 GB | Kit | 2×4 GB |
| 2,400 MHz | Speed | 2,666 MHz |
| — | CAS latency | CL15 |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $78 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 or G.Skill Ripjaws 4 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 2666 CL15 better?
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 and G.Skill Ripjaws 4 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 2666 CL15 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Total capacity: Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 2400 leads (16 GB vs 8 GB). Speed: G.Skill Ripjaws 4 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 2666 CL15 leads (2,666 MHz vs 2,400 MHz).
Which one is faster?
Speed: G.Skill Ripjaws 4 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 2666 CL15 leads (2,666 MHz vs 2,400 MHz).