Crucial CT32G4LFD424A 32GB (1x32GB) DDR4 2400 CL17 vs Klevv Neo 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 2400 CL11
Crucial CT32G4LFD424A 32GB (1x32GB) DDR4 2400 CL17
1×32 GB · DDR4 · 2400 MHz · CL17Klevv Neo 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 2400 CL11
4×8 GB · DDR3 · 2400 MHz · CL11Crucial CT32G4LFD424A 32GB (1x32GB) DDR4 2400 CL17 and Klevv Neo 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 2400 CL11 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64.
- CAS latency: Klevv Neo 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 2400 CL11 leads (CL11 vs CL17).
- Klevv Neo 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 2400 CL11 has lower true latency (9.2 ns vs 14.2 ns; speed and CL combined).
Klevv Neo 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 2400 CL11
If you care most about cAS latency, true latency.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Crucial CT32G4LFD424A 32GB (1x32GB) DDR4 2400 CL17 | Klevv Neo 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 2400 CL11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | Gear score | 64 |
| DDR4 | Type | DDR3 |
| 32 GB | Total capacity | 32 GB |
| 1×32 GB | Kit | 4×8 GB |
| 2,400 MHz | Speed | 2,400 MHz |
| CL17 | CAS latency | CL11 |
| ≈ $144 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Crucial CT32G4LFD424A 32GB (1x32GB) DDR4 2400 CL17 or Klevv Neo 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 2400 CL11 better?
Crucial CT32G4LFD424A 32GB (1x32GB) DDR4 2400 CL17 and Klevv Neo 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 2400 CL11 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64. CAS latency: Klevv Neo 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 2400 CL11 leads (CL11 vs CL17). Klevv Neo 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 2400 CL11 has lower true latency (9.2 ns vs 14.2 ns; speed and CL combined).