Memory kits / Comparison

G.Skill Ripjaws 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11 vs Mushkin ECO2 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11

RAM · G.Skill

G.Skill Ripjaws 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11

4×8 GB · DDR3 · 1600 MHz · CL11

Average

Capacity90

Speed18

Latency64

Generation25

RAM · Mushkin

Mushkin ECO2 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11

4×8 GB · DDR3 · 1600 MHz · CL11

Average

Capacity90

Speed18

Latency64

Generation25

Verdict

G.Skill Ripjaws 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11 and Mushkin ECO2 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.

Spec-by-spec comparison

G.Skill Ripjaws 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11		Mushkin ECO2 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11
52	Gear score	52
DDR3	Type	DDR3
32 GB	Total capacity	32 GB
4×8 GB	Kit	4×8 GB
1,600 MHz	Speed	1,600 MHz
CL11	CAS latency	CL11

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PC See the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is G.Skill Ripjaws 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11 or Mushkin ECO2 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11 better?

G.Skill Ripjaws 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11 and Mushkin ECO2 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1600 CL11 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.

Similar comparisons