G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6400 CL32 vs TeamGroup T-Force Xtreem 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6800 CL36 FFXD596G6800HC36DDC01
G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6400 CL32
2×48 GB · DDR5 · 6400 MHz · CL32TeamGroup T-Force Xtreem 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6800 CL36 FFXD596G6800HC36DDC01
2×48 GB · DDR5 · 6800 MHz · CL36G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6400 CL32 and TeamGroup T-Force Xtreem 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6800 CL36 FFXD596G6800HC36DDC01 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- Speed: TeamGroup T-Force Xtreem 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6800 CL36 FFXD596G6800HC36DDC01 leads (6,800 MHz vs 6,400 MHz).
- CAS latency: G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6400 CL32 leads (CL32 vs CL36).
- G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6400 CL32 has lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 10.6 ns; speed and CL combined).
G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6400 CL32
If you care most about cAS latency, true latency.
TeamGroup T-Force Xtreem 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6800 CL36 FFXD596G6800HC36DDC01
If you care most about speed.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6400 CL32 | TeamGroup T-Force Xtreem 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6800 CL36 FFXD596G6800HC36DDC01 | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| DDR5 | Type | DDR5 |
| 96 GB | Total capacity | 96 GB |
| 2×48 GB | Kit | 2×48 GB |
| 6,400 MHz | Speed | 6,800 MHz |
| CL32 | CAS latency | CL36 |
| ≈ $640 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6400 CL32 or TeamGroup T-Force Xtreem 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6800 CL36 FFXD596G6800HC36DDC01 better?
G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6400 CL32 and TeamGroup T-Force Xtreem 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6800 CL36 FFXD596G6800HC36DDC01 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. Speed: TeamGroup T-Force Xtreem 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6800 CL36 FFXD596G6800HC36DDC01 leads (6,800 MHz vs 6,400 MHz). CAS latency: G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6400 CL32 leads (CL32 vs CL36). G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6400 CL32 has lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 10.6 ns; speed and CL combined).
Which one is faster?
Speed: TeamGroup T-Force Xtreem 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6800 CL36 FFXD596G6800HC36DDC01 leads (6,800 MHz vs 6,400 MHz).