G.Skill Ripjaws V 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4600 CL20 vs G.Skill Trident Z RGB 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4400 CL19
G.Skill Ripjaws V 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4600 CL20
2×32 GB · DDR4 · 4600 MHz · CL20G.Skill Trident Z RGB 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4400 CL19
2×32 GB · DDR4 · 4400 MHz · CL19G.Skill Ripjaws V 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4600 CL20 and G.Skill Trident Z RGB 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4400 CL19 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 88 and 88.
- Speed: G.Skill Ripjaws V 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4600 CL20 leads (4,600 MHz vs 4,400 MHz).
- CAS latency: G.Skill Trident Z RGB 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4400 CL19 leads (CL19 vs CL20).
G.Skill Ripjaws V 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4600 CL20
If you care most about speed.
G.Skill Trident Z RGB 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4400 CL19
If you care most about cAS latency.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| G.Skill Ripjaws V 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4600 CL20 | G.Skill Trident Z RGB 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4400 CL19 | |
|---|---|---|
| 88 | Gear score | 88 |
| DDR4 | Type | DDR4 |
| 64 GB | Total capacity | 64 GB |
| 2×32 GB | Kit | 2×32 GB |
| 4,600 MHz | Speed | 4,400 MHz |
| CL20 | CAS latency | CL19 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is G.Skill Ripjaws V 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4600 CL20 or G.Skill Trident Z RGB 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4400 CL19 better?
G.Skill Ripjaws V 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4600 CL20 and G.Skill Trident Z RGB 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4400 CL19 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 88 and 88. Speed: G.Skill Ripjaws V 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4600 CL20 leads (4,600 MHz vs 4,400 MHz). CAS latency: G.Skill Trident Z RGB 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4400 CL19 leads (CL19 vs CL20).
Which one is faster?
Speed: G.Skill Ripjaws V 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 4600 CL20 leads (4,600 MHz vs 4,400 MHz).