GeIL EVO X II AMD 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 vs HP V10 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200 CL14
GeIL EVO X II AMD 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 3200 CL16
2×32 GB · DDR4 · 3200 MHz · CL16HP V10 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200 CL14
2×16 GB · DDR4 · 3200 MHz · CL14GeIL EVO X II AMD 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 and HP V10 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200 CL14 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79.
- Total capacity: GeIL EVO X II AMD 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 leads (64 GB vs 32 GB).
- CAS latency: HP V10 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200 CL14 leads (CL14 vs CL16).
- HP V10 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200 CL14 has lower true latency (8.8 ns vs 10.0 ns; speed and CL combined).
GeIL EVO X II AMD 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 3200 CL16
If you care most about total capacity.
HP V10 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200 CL14
If you care most about cAS latency, true latency.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| GeIL EVO X II AMD 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 | HP V10 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200 CL14 | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 79 |
| DDR4 | Type | DDR4 |
| 64 GB | Total capacity | 32 GB |
| 2×32 GB | Kit | 2×16 GB |
| 3,200 MHz | Speed | 3,200 MHz |
| CL16 | CAS latency | CL14 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is GeIL EVO X II AMD 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 or HP V10 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200 CL14 better?
GeIL EVO X II AMD 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 and HP V10 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200 CL14 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79. Total capacity: GeIL EVO X II AMD 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 leads (64 GB vs 32 GB). CAS latency: HP V10 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200 CL14 leads (CL14 vs CL16). HP V10 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200 CL14 has lower true latency (8.8 ns vs 10.0 ns; speed and CL combined).